Madonna
Needs to be "Swept Away" By
Ramon Jaime
| CNLA Correspondent
Thursday, October 17, 2002 9:45am PST
Granted, I shall more than likely lose my gay card after spewing my vitriol
upon the latest Madonna offering, but oh, what the hell. We need another
icon about now.
After
the unlikely victory of ``Evita'' (1996), I had hoped Madonna would take
her ill-gotten Golden Globe Award and exit in the shadows of the soon
to be forgotten.
But queasy filmgoers and die-hard Madonna fans were then subjected to
the bomb "The Next Best Thing'' (2000) and are now subjected to something
much worse - "Swept Away."
At this point, Madonna most resembles a spiteful child who simply will
not take no for an answer.
Madonna's husband, Guy Ritchie, is predictably the director of her latest
effort. Ritchie made his mark with ``Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels''
(1998), a stylishly derivative, cartoonishly violent romp. His encore
effort, the suavely titled ``Snatch'' (2000), is in essence a remake of
his first film but with Brad Pitt. His latest film is a soulless remake
of ``Swept Away . . . by an unusual destiny in the blue sea of August,''
a terrific, time-specific 1975 comedy about gender warfare by Italian
filmmaker Lina Wertmuller (``Seven Beauties'').
Wertmuller's film strands a haughty northern Italian socialite (the magnificently
bronzed goddess Mariangela Melato) and the hotheaded Sicilian crew member
(Giancarlo Giannini) she had taunted on her husband's yacht on a deserted
Mediterranean isle and let nature take its course. The result was an incendiary
Marxist-Freudian ``Taming of the Shrew.''
Ritchie's deracinated ``Swept Away,'' which is about 30 minutes shorter
than Wertmuller's film, follows the same plot line but tones down the
fire and gender violence.
Madonna looks absolutely bizarre with cleavage, muscle and protruding
ribs playing Amber, the spoiled, abusive, foul-mouthed wife (what a stretch
- but she can't even act in a role which doesn't require acting) of a
pharmaceuticals baron (Bruce Greenwood). In the role made famous by Giannini,
who made a credible bid to rival Marcello Mastroianni in people's hearts,
Ritchie has cast Giannini's son, Adriano, who is notably younger than
Madonna.
On a boat chartered by rich, decadent Americans to take them to Italy,
Giannini's Pepe Esposito declares class warfare against Amber after she
taunts him by calling him ``Pee-Pee'' and ``Guido'' and spurning the fish
he catches for dinner. Third graders could come up with more clever insults.
On the isle,
Pepe's skills as an outdoorsman give him the advantage and he takes it.
He slaps Amber in the face twice and in another scene almost forces himself
on her (these scenes are not as funny as they might have seemed in 1975).
In the state of nature, power shifts to the worker. But at this point
in the movie, we want Madonna to be slapped.
Soon, Amber is kissing Pepe's hands and feet, and the two embark upon
a torrid affair.
But the chemistry is not there. The ``Zorba the Greek''-style music might
sound retro-hip to the British Ritchie, but it's inappropriate, and in
one particularly gratuitous sequence, Pepe imagines Amber dressed in a
swirling, golden Versace party dress and serenading him (thankfully, Madonna
doesn't sing; she lip-syncs Della Reese's 1961 version of ``Come On-A
My House'').
The handsome Giannini is good, perhaps because he re-creates his father's
performance with such filial devotion and love. But let's face it. Madonna
just can't act. We try, and we try, but it just isn't there. And I'm being
kind. It's sort of like Survivor crossed with Fear Factor. They're on
an island, but there's vile parts being fed (Madonna's acting) but we
watch. Perhaps for the last time.
I just want to know WHAT WERE THEY THINKING! A remake of any kind by the
Inferior Girl should have been nixed. Even the dailies should have given
an indication that this film should have been lost at sea. No script rewrite
could have saved this film. Only a casting change. But I suppose we know
who wears the pants in the Ritchie household.
Of the three
women in "Swept Away,'' one is a moronic boy-toy, another a sluttish
drug addict and the third a castrating shrew. I would find being castrated
much more enjoyable than watching this film. No, really I would.